Carrie Prejean nixed Playboy, calls being fired a 'political debate'
Carrie Prejean is stunned that her Miss California Crown has been taken away.
Especially because those mean old pageant officials just tried to make her pose for Playboy and appear on "I'm a Celebrity ... Get me Out of Here" with Spencer and Heidi Pratt!
Carrie Prejean tells TMZ that pageant honchos actually asked recently her to take those two gigs.
She was told that Playboy had offered $140,000 for her to pose semi-nude.
She rejected both offers.
Pageant official Keith Lewis explained to TMZ that he was merely passing every offer along because Carrie had asked that they do so.
Prejean, who insists she has been consistently cooperative, calls this whole firing thing "a political debate." "They don't agree with the stance that I took [on gay marriage]. Shanna [Moakler] is trying to bash me. They don't like me. From Day One they wanted me out, and they got what they wanted."
Prejean can't believe Donald Trump said she treated people badly. "I was very respectful of people even when they slandered me and humiliated me," she said. "I have not once stooped down to their level."
What do you think. Who's telling the truth?
Related Miss California dish:
Shanna Moakler could not be happier about Carrie Prejean getting the boot
Carrie Prejean backs out of Fox News gig
More stars attacked by vulgar winds!
Carrie Prejean tells Sean Hannity she will NOT pose for Playboy. Do you believe her?
Carrie Prejean explains the topless photos and blames it on the "wind."
Carrie Prejean's new topless photos and Michael Phelps' behind.
Perez Hilton says God told him to ask Carrie Prejean the gay marriage question.
Carrie Prejean does PSA for anti-gay group
Nude photos mock my faith, says Carrie Prejean
Photo: WireImage
WHO CARESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS???????????????????????????????????????????????? NOBODY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Who's telling the truth? Are you serious about this question?
See their email communications: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,525726,00.html
From: cprejeanXXXX
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 10:09 AMTo: Keith LewisSubject: Re: Messages
Ok then I expect you to provide security per my request like you agreed to provide
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
---
From: "Keith Lewis"Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 10:10:25 -0700To: Subject: RE: Messages
Carrie,
Although I do not agree with your directive nor is this letter an indication of our intent to waive our contract rights, we do not want to escalate the situation with you. In good faith, we will simply ask that you provide us all of the details so that we can block it in on our master calendar. We would also want to get the contact information should something come up - like you become missing after the event or you are in an accident before the event and need us to reach out for you. It is for your safety and our responsibility.
Best regards,
Keith Lewis
---
From: cprejeanXXXXSent: Friday, May 29, 2009 7:57 AMTo: Keith LewisSubject: Re: Messages
You do not cooperate with me, and you pick and chose the the things YOU want me to do. That is not happening anymore. Stop speaking for me. I have MY own voice. What are u gonna do fire me for volunteering for the special olympics hahaha ur crazy No I am doing this appearance. You do not need details. Its for the SPECIAL OLYMPICS!!! You just need to know I will be doing it alright
You will not facilitate this appearance
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
---
From: "Keith Lewis"Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 08:01:35 -0700To: Subject: RE: Messages
Carrie,
As we have discussed, there is proper protocol and we have not waived our rights in any way to your contract. I am happy to try and facilitate the request. Please forward over the information along with the proper contact and we will try and confirm the appearance right away.
Best regards,
Keith Lewis
---
From: cprejeanXXXXSent: Friday, May 29, 2009 7:40 AMTo: Keith LewisSubject: Re: Messages
I expect you to be forwarding me ALL email requests and interview requests to me. I know how you are and its not right if you are selecting things for me. Thanks for your cooperation And fyi I am a presenter of medals at the special olympics in a few weeks for the summer games. So now u know I am doing this and I expect your full support. Also I was asked to fill in for a dj on a local radio show.. Ill be reading from a show biz script monday. I am doing this
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
---
From: "Keith Lewis"Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 07:49:07 -0700To: Subject: RE: Messages
Carrie,
I have given you the details completely. Perhaps it is not something you would like to partake in, either way, you can let me know and I will respond to them today.
Best regards,
Keith Lewis
---
From: cprejeanXXXXSent: Friday, May 29, 2009 7:42 AMTo: Keith LewisSubject: Re: Messages
Just as you need details for things so do I. Also nice move trying to make money off of my appearances Also.. Do not try and silence me by saying I do not have a comment about the prop 8 ruling. Maybe you don't. I do
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
---
From: "Keith Lewis"Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 07:43:45 -0700To: Subject: RE: Messages
Carrie,
It is for a general meeting – please see the explanation below.
Best regards,
Keith Lewis
---
From: cprejeanXXXXSent: Friday, May 29, 2009 7:38 AMTo: Keith LewisSubject: Re: Messages
What is this for?
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
---
From: "Keith Lewis"Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 07:19:18 -0700To: Carrie PrejeanSubject: FW: Messages
Carrie,
The Style Network has asked to schedule a general meeting. Generals in the entertainment field are an opportunity for casting and producing executives to gain a better understanding of a potential talents range and demeanor in order to consider them for future projects. They are done without a specific agenda. I have had great success with my actors who have taken generals and would suggest you give it strong consideration. You never know where it may lead and sometimes they develop entire shows around you. The following days are available to meet with them here in LA. Please let me know as soon as possible if any of them work for you.
Best regards,
Keith Lewis
No, it's because you were to busy promoting your personal agenda instead of doing your job as Miss California. The runner-up was doing it for you.
Shanna Moakler is a washed-up porno poser that is absolutely disgusting. She has no doubt been working with Keith Lewis to undermine Carrie from day one.
It's good that Carrie is now clear of this mess. The Miss Universe organization is a moral train wreck. All that's missing from making it a real freak show are some lesbian and transsexual contestants.... although the contract specifically states that contestants must be "Natural Born Women"
Ask a political question and you'll get a political answer. 50% of Californians are against gay marriage; if you don't want to know don't ask. Are christians being excluded from these political beauty pageants from now on?! Does not seem a clever move to me.
What a mess!!, Carrie is better off moving on and doing somthing more worth while.
Carrie shine on!!
It's all about the comments, everybody knows it, and the gays are having a field day. But everyone knows that no matter what, she'll always be the defacto Ms. America, and gay marriage will never fully be accepted. (Because you're not equal to a straight couple. Understand it. It's just not the same.) But I say the score is even; Prejean may have lost her crown, but she's still ms. America, and Prop 8 is still up 6 to 1. Go cry in your rainbow flag.
Never cared what these beauty pagents are for. A loads of politics involve in these beauty pagents. People like Carrie Prejean should never be given this much importanace.
She is dumb, insenstive and her views are immature. With her being fired from this beauty pagent, she is back in lime light. As of now things are going get worse, before they get better and we actually forget her. Oooohhhhh ..
Being gay isn't the only sin punishable by death in the bible. Stoning children to death when they misbehave is perfectly acceptable and actually demanded by the imaginary god of the first testament. I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself? Also, Leviticus 25:44 states that I may buy slaves from the nations that are around us. Perhaps the bible is repulsive. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkXOwBIRX7Y
Carrie, Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's law. When someone tries to defend homosexuality, for example, we can simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. One question Carrie, the bible also states, I must sell my daughter into slavery, as stated in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?