Angelina Jolie breast-feeds on the cover of W?
Sources who've seen the exclusive W magazine photos of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt -- shot by Brad Pitt -- confirm Angie really is breast-feeding on the November issue cover shot.
"Angelina posed for Brad [Pitt] in one of the photos while breast-feeding," the source reveals to Life & Style. "It's really beautiful and tastefully done."
"The photos are amazing," adds a second source.
Brad shot the photos in mid-August at the family's French home, Château Miraval.
Most of the 21 shots were taken in the garden and include some nearly nude ones as well as ones of her making faces with her kids.
The W mag will hit the newsstands on Oct. 21.
Gosh, we can hardly wait.
I don't get it. This couple has a team of security to stop intrusive paparazzi from snapping photos of them in the privacy of their home. They even had a recent bloody run-in with a few of these paps.
Then they go and take photos of a very intimate and private moment for a magazine cover?
I'm confused.
You don't think it's the money, do you?
Nah.
Photo: Angelina Jolie at the "Changeling" premiere in New York last weekend.
Credit: WireImage
Post a comment
- Most Liked
- Most Commented
By owning the photos, the Jolie-Pitts can earn dollars for their charitable foundation. The got around $15 mil for the first pix of the twins and family. This goes to help children who do not have parents. These two are making some lovely history. They are bringing the brother's keeper example to the children. Jesus would be pleased.
So what! The Grateful Dead Movie released a while ago has a video of a mother breast feeding her child while a public show was being put together by
the roadies. She was being interviewed and later other kids were dancing around having a blast. In cave men times (and even now) some woman do that naturally so men become less infactuated with her breasts as a sexual attraction and more supportive of her breasts
as a form of life and nurishment. Mother Mary breast fed Jesus in public
too. So I say go ahead and feed the children so long as it is done with a level of self respect and not exploiting the child to sell a sexual photo. Why pay for the milk when you own the cow anyway Angel?
It's ok to share your own photos and you're not invading your own privacy taking them. The paparazzi don't let you choose and it's an invasion of privacy.
Does it really matter? How many movies has A.J. been in where she is either topless or totally nude? I've lost count. It's nothing the world hasn't seen already.
Like it or not, there are people who want to see them. this way they control the access - and, really, if Pitt took the pictures, how much was their life intruded on?
Contrast that with being stalked by greedy ******** who endanger them and their family and who would make their lives a living hell. they can't even go outside without being assaulted by jerks with cameras. And you can't see the difference between that and Pitt taking pictures at home and then deciding to show them to whoever wants to see them?
And why do you blast them for taking money for pictures of themselves, but not a single criticism for aggressive and threatening people who assault them for pictures they can sell? Paparazi are parasites.
There is nothing "intimate" and "private" about feeding your child. Besides if breasts can be used on the cover of mags to excite men or sell beer I think it is okay if they are also shown being used for their biological purpose, which is to feed a child.
No one wants to see her boobs - whether or not one or more of her illegitimate children is attached to them.
Wow.
That's what breasts are for, lest we forget.
It would be wise of any celebrity to flood the market with personal pictures so there is no demand and therefore no paparazzi.