What happened to Keira Knightley's beautiful hair?

Boo on Vogue. How do you take a gorgeous girl like Keira and make her look drab?

It doesn't matter to me, I'll still buy her cover, because she's a wonderfully talented actress and my favourite actor period, but were the editors sleeping when they approved this pic?

It's called a HAIR STYLE. I guess whoever wrote this article is unaware of simple concepts like LIGHTING and HAIR STYLES that tend to make someone look different. if you actually LOOKED at recent pictures of her, her hair stayed the same. Is this your first professional article?

You are such an idiot really. Of course Keira still has her own long hair. In this cover they have created this look for herself that personally think is beautiful although unusual. They might have hide her hairs physically in someway or removed them digitally but they are still there. It's been a long time since Keira hs had a proper haircut.

I expected something a little better. The picture is to simple. That beautful face of hers should have been shown differently

An absolutely hedious cover for an otherwise pretty girl. What the hell? I hear corny 80's one hit wonder pop music when I look at that cover.

She's beautiful and talented regardless of her hairstyle.

I think they were going for the Audrey Hepburn look. At first glance, her bottom looks the size of Oprah/Orca because of the light blue in background below her right hand. Just not a well-thought-out photo.

I saw this on gofugyourself.com. I wanted to scream. Why would vogue do this to her.