Hillary Rodham Clinton's orange pantsuit vs Michelle Obama's blue dress!
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's speech at the Democratic National Convention Tuesday night was all about Democratic party unity.
But for her historic speech to unite the party and guarantee support for Sen. Barack Obama, she chose an orange pantsuit over red, blue or lilac versions, all of which were seen on NBC news when they were held up to be color-tested hours before she before she stepped onstage.
Picking the orange outfit could have meant that it simply looked better against the blue background. She's worn orange several times this year, so perhaps it was more flattering to HIllary's hair and skin tones.
But there might be another reason. Does picking orange over blue or lilac, which would have coordinated with Michelle Obama's teal blue dress worn Tuesday night, have a deeper meaning?
Subliminally, to some observers it means that Hillary Clinton is maintaining her political individuality, not following the color code set by the Obama camp.
On the surface, it may sound silly. But small things, like the color of a pantsuit, can telegraph big political messages.
So though her speech was all about party unity, HIllary remains very formidable and individual. And she still wants to be president one day, which might be easier if the Republicans are defeated by Barack Obama this year.
What do you think? Hillary did a good job of verbally uniting the party over the issues of jobs, budget, the Iraq war, alternative fuel and healthcare.
But what did that orange pantsuit mean to you?
See more of HIllary Rodham Clinton's fashion evolution and her "sisterhood of the traveling pantsuits" that led her to choosing her outfit for this historic speech.
Photo: Getty Images


Loved the orange pant suit ........hated the dress
Don't you people have anything better to do than worry about the meaning of Hilary's pantsuit. The world is going to hell in a handbasket and we need to think about color. Too insane
I thought there was something to the suit, even mentioned it in an article, but couldn't put my finger on it...I think you nailed it.
This is a ridiculous post; there is no subliminal message here. The orange clearly looked the best against that background.
You're right it does seem silly.
I'm an Obama girl, but I have to admit Hillary Clinton looked great. One question though: Why is it that a woman's appearance is always subject to public comment?
She is a monster!
You're kidding, right?
Wow, could you get any more trivial - or sexist?
If there is any more proof of why the print media is losing more and more readers - it because of The Dish Rag by Elizabeth Snead.
Just a completely waste of space and time - Ms Snead should spend more time trying to be a real journalist and less about trying to become a celebrity...