Oh Manolo! What's going on with Matthew Broderick and Sarah Jessica Parker?
According to various reports, including this week's Star magazine, always a reliable (satire alert) source, Matthew Broderick 's been getting himself a little extra "Sex in the City."
Just not with his wife of 11 years, Sarah Jessica Parker.
The Star reports Broderick was sneaking around with a young redhead earlier this year. While SJP was busy being Carrie.
Ouch.
After reportedly meeting in a bar, Matthew began texting the 25-year-old youth counselor, the woman's pal told The Star. They began seeing each other and things got passionate quickly when they met at the Manhattan townhouse of a showbiz friend.
OK, passionate? With Matthew Broderick?
Sources say the woman felt conflicted with her relationship with Matthew, whom she nicknamed "Matty Cakes."
While Sarah Jessica Parker was busy filming "Sex and the City: The Movie" -- multiple eyewitnesses say they saw Matthew make many late-night visits to the other woman's apartment building.
The couple has been married 11 years and have a son, 5. According to the Daily Mail, Broderick's publicist Simon Halls had "no comment."
Photo: Courtesy of The Star.
Post a comment
- Most Liked
- Most Commented
ugh he is sooooo homely, and she deserves a Mr. Big type no a Mr. Homely type, I hope she gets her freak on, and that their kids are ok
Well I thought that film was shot in New York, so it seems unlikely SJP was "away for four months" in Los Angeles like the article says. But it definitely could happen, Matty Cakes has slimmed down quite a bit over the past year and he still has those "bedroom eyes."
thats so wrong !!!!
i can't believe he has the nerve to cheat on her. she can sooo much better she's super fly and he's blah. i'm just sorry she has to go through the heartbreak stage. she'll be fine.
What about the Breck Girl? Oh that's right, the LATimes censures commenting on Dem politicians when they get caught with their pants down, especially when it's a hypocrite like Edwards......
Do you people believe everything you read. And please, SJP is one of the biggest hoaxes of beauty ever played in the history of Hollywood. Matthew is adorable. She looks like a witch. Ugh.
So, the L.A. Times will report on this story, with their only source being Star. Yet you aren't allowed to talk about the John Edwards story, because the source comes from The Enquirer?
Hypocrisy, anyone?
You can write about this but not Edwards?
The LA Times covers this drivel and not a local story involving a national political figure? No wonder you're going out of business. Are you in bed with Edwards and not Matthew Broderick? What lousy taste. Get someone in charge who knows the blogosphere.
Seems strange--Rumors are OK about some public figures, but not if they involve prominent Democrats?
Hey LAT, your bias is showing...