Should Hollywood clean up Heath's legacy?
Is Hollywood whitewashing Heath Ledger's biography?
"Entertainment Tonight/The Insider" paid a hefty chunk of cash for a video that reportedly shows Ledger doing drugs at the Chateau Marmont in January 2007. In a clip that has been widely teased, Ledger is seen talking about smoking five joints a day for 20 years. 
But after an e-mail from the actor's publicity firm, ID PR, was circulated throughout Hollywood, both shows decided not to air the video.
My inside sources say the decision was less about taste and more about a threatened lawsuit.
"Out of respect for Heath Ledger's family, Entertainment Tonight and The Insider have decided not to run the Heath Ledger video which has been circulating in the world media,"' said a statement on the show's website.
But is this a good precedent to set for so-called entertainment news shows?
I'm a huge fan of Heath Ledger. I first talked to the then-unknown young Australian actor for USA Today about his role in Mel Gibson's "The Patriot." And I was fortunate enough to speak with him often during "Brokeback Mountain's" sweep of the 2006 awards season.
I found him to be gentle, sensitive, sweet-natured, incredibly talented. He also seemed incredibly vulnerable, a lot like Johnny Depp.
That said, I'm also a fan of the media serving the public with information that might help prevent unnecessary tragedy. If the public knew that Ledger was struggling with addiction, is it possible that resulting media scrutiny could have forced Ledger's loved ones to get him the care he needed?
Dr. Drew Pinsky had viewed the tape and was interviewed to offer perspective.
"I have treated many celebrities and many of them have been functioning at a very high level using a lot of substances. The reality is that when a 28-year-old seemingly healthy man, whom we love and respect, dies suddenly, there is a reason. His death plays upon our deepest fears. We owe it to the public to try to answer the question why. I am convinced that if this heart-wrenching video had aired, it would have gotten through and had a positive effect on young people in America. Perhaps it could have even saved lives," Pinsky told "Entertainment Tonight."
I watched a very under-the-influence Brad Renfro make quite a scene at a swanky Hollywood party several years ago. Not only did none of his celebrity friends, or the publicists throwing the bash, find his stumbling, slurring, falling down and bleeding nose unusual, but not one reporter covering the party reported it. I tried to. But it was edited out of my then-newspaper's party item.
Hollywood publicists, managers and agents can often be the worst enablers. They are the spin-meisters, part of the protective circle that surrounds stars and tries to keep any bad behavior -- drugs, spousal abuse, drinking -- out of the news.
Why? Because that is what they're paid to do. Make no mistake, they make money off celebrities just like the paparazzi.
The big problem I have with Hollywood's time-honored "Cone of Celebrity Silence" is this: When drug use or addiction goes unreported, unspoken and unnoticed, the addict continues to use drugs without the consequences needed to help them hit bottom and seek help. And very often, these people die.
And when the truth about a celebrity's drug use isn't reported, that person's millions of fans never know how dangerous drug use -- often perceived as glamorous and cool -- really is.
So I don't think showing a video of Heath, reportedly showing him doing drugs and talking about his use, would be doing Ledger's memory a disservice.
Perhaps it's a little too soon and feels a little too sensational. But as the days go by, if I were his parents, or his girlfriend and mother of his child, I would want his fans to know how evil, deadly and dangerous drugs can be.
Revealing possible drug use doesn't take away from his talent or his legacy. It spreads awareness.
So think what you want about "The Insider" teasing the video and attempting to air it. And say what you will about TMZ dogging Britney Spears. Sure, the paps are making money off the videos and photos of Britney. I'm not saying their motives are noble. But consider for a moment that the resulting media attention might have spared Spears from many more months, perhaps years, of confusion, unhappiness, questionable behavior or worse.
Had TMZ not videotaped her high-speed driving antics, her erratic mood swings, her British accent, those kids might still be riding around with her -- and probably not in child-safety seats. And she might not be in UCLA Medical Center right now, with her parents around her, finally getting the medical help she desperately needs.
So if you want to honor Heath's memory, don't censor yourself from reading or viewing new information about the causes of his untimely and unnecessary death. In my opinion, drug abuse is an important public discussion. But please post your comments on this topic if you disagree.
Below you can read the statement released by Heath's former publicity agency IDPR....
Here's the e-mail from the publicists:
Subject: Entertainment Tonight and Heath Ledger - FYI
Tonight Entertainment Tonight/The Insider are previewing an extremely distasteful segment regarding Heath Ledger. The segment centers around a two-year old video ET purchased for a large sum of money in the hopes of stirring up a salacious and exploitive story about Heath, which would win them big ratings on the first day of sweeps. The two outlets did not even have the courtesy to wait until after Heath's burial to broadcast this segment. They intend to air the full segment tomorrow.
For the sake of his grieving family and friends, his child, and common decency, we hope to pressure Entertainment Tonight and The Insider to do the right thing and pull the spot. This is not journalism, it is sensationalism. It is a shameful exploitation of the lowest kind, to a talented and gentle soul, undeserving of such treatment.
We are asking the Hollywood community to pressure Entertainment Tonight to pull the segment. Please take action so that Heath's family can grieve in peace. Please forward this message to everyone you know and ask them to personally call Linda Bell Blue at Entertainment Tonight and Brad Bessey at Paramount to express their outrage and request Entertainment Tonight to pull the distasteful spot. Their information is listed below.
Thank you.
Photo: WireImage


How many designer vodka launch parties have you covered, Elizabeth?
Alcohol kills people too.
Why all this focus on drugs and NOT alcohol? You sound like some empty sloganeer.
People like myself on the verge of losing family members to alcoholism just don't rate around you, do we?
If you're going to campaign against deadly addictions, then don't forget the ones that YOU help enable, dear.
Let the video rip. It might truly help someone. Sorry for the family but it is such a big world. People need to know a little more about these celebrities and substance abuse -- not to show the video fuels the notion that such people are bullet-proof. They are not. Toxicology test results are pending, as they always say.
Amen. My thoughts exactly; I agree with you. I think knowing the truth could potentially save someone else's life. We can blindly patronize him or learn a lesson, and still appreciate his movies that he's left us. Thanks for the article.
you ask: "If the public knew that Ledger was struggling with addiction, is it possible that resulting media scrutiny could have forced Ledger's loved ones to get him the care he needed?"
The idea that this information about Mr. Ledger's drug use could have saved him from himself (if drugs were in fact the cause of death - it has not yet be determined to be so) is ludicrous. We have no idea what his loved ones attempted to do or not do to help him. In point of fact, we do not know he needed "help" at all.
I checked out the video on youtube so I could respond to Dr. Pinsky's comments. It never ceases to amaze me when physicians feel it appropriate to discuss the health of someone who is not their patient. As to his suggestion that the airing of this particular video "could have even saved lives" well, it's too ridiculous a comment to respond to in a brief manner.
This video holds no value to anyone struggling with addiction. This video was going to be played for one reason - greed. People with addictions do not need to be fodder for these entertainment magazine shows. They need support, not humiliation.
As for Brad Renfro, that was a terrible loss as well. And Ms. Snead seems to think if only she reported on his stumbling, slurring, bloodied nose escapade a few years ago, maybe things would have been different. Oh, yeah, that's right - you tried to report it but it was edited out. Look on the bright side - you got to report it now and also claim some sort of moral high ground. With friends like you...
The video does not show Mr Ledger doing drugs. That is not true.
I agree that we should know the fact--Heather may have a drug addiction problem, but I don't agree that we should broadcast a video, which violates someone else's privacy. I haven't seen this video so I cannot comment on if this particular video should be broadcasted. I still believe that even celebrities deserve their privacy and dignity. I don't know about this particular video, if it was recorded under the condition that Heather knew it would not go public. As a result, he felt he could express himself freely. If this was the case, then I don't feel it is fair to be broadcasted now. The answer simply is--if Heather didn't think this video should go public when he was alive, then his wish should be respected even though he is dead. In terms of those mainstream media, I simply don't believe that they want to broadcast this video for the sake of public good, but poll rating and profits.
Hollywood is full of double standards. Remember Anna Nicole Smith? Remember the pathetic video of a pregnant, obviously under the influence, messy clown-faced former model, slurry her words and acting crazy? did that help anyone? nope. it didn't help anyone at all. for if it did, then perhaps Renfro and Ledger would still be alive, if they both did in fact die of drug overdoses (and I say IF since the autopsy reports are NOT in and anything else is purely speculative). No, these videos don't serve anybody but the horrible entertainment shows and the public's morbid curiosity.
and why the double standard? why didn't anyone stand up and ask these shows to not show that Anna Nicole video? It all boils down to their status and representation. Oscar winner vs. Playboy model. ID/PR vs. whoever repped Anna Nicole. ID/PR is very powerful and reps a slew of A-list clients. Anna Nicole's reps? Not sure who they were, but they obviously didn't care. I personally don't want to see the video. I don't care. He's dead. He's not coming back. Matilda has no dad. That's the tragedy.
Twenty-somethings often party.
What else is new?
It's a time of life that's wide open to exploring the world and ourselves
in all kinds of ways and settings.
Just how it is.
Heath Ledger may had a problem. But why assume that was what did him in? Why can't we be patient and wait for the drug tests report, which will be out in a few days time. Why are we so anxiously jump to conclusions beyond evidence? The video was taken 2 years ago. And in it, Heath acknowledge his behavior and may well have conscious to make a change for better. He is gone now and he would never be able to defend himself. Why can't the media let him RIP?
I think the family has the right to decide whether they want him to be the "example" for others. If the family wanted a platform to preach Heath as an example, there would be a farther reach on Oprah's show than some silly entertainment show.