Angie, why so glum at the Globes?

Hey Elizabeth Snead. Quit pulling sh*t outta your *** and throwing it your readers. Your so full of it - do you not even bother pretending your an actual columnist in a real newspaper? Or is it understood your a jealous embittered hack who powertrips on her laptop TRYING to rip your betters to pieces.

You are every typical catty b*tch who hates on the beautiful girl who has everything.

A few of you cheesey tabloid writers and tv host monkeys have crossed the line and now really believe YOU are the news, whether it's 'Lyin' PEE CRUST,' or you, ElizaB*tch PEED, you all have one thing in common - taking out all your repressed and deep-seated issues on hapless actors who wander into your sites.

Except you horrid haters forget one thing, it's really hard to fabricate sh*t and lie in the age of digital video and youtube. As a result the enumerable photos of Angelina smiling, and laughing and in particular, very graciously speaking with that namby pamby 'Lyin' Peecrust,' are all over the web to check out. People like Peecrust, actually come off as vaguely stalkerish and obsessed with Jolie; 'Waaaah, why won't Angelina engage me in even more banal chit-chat about 'bacon & eggs,' which she did not have for breakfast, so I can continue to not ask Brad about HIS nomination and HIS best picture winning film.'

This douchebag is actually on record as saying "I ask her 4 questions," and when she didn't answer in the way he liked, despite her polite smile and deference to Brad, he says he "stuck the mic in her face and left it there." Somebody needs to b*tch slap him into next week!

OH Yes, always remember, it's all about the Peecrust...Brad who?? Angie who??

As for people like you Elizab*tch, MEOW. Your reaction to Angelina is what cripples many women from ever achieving anything of substance - as you come across so blinded with rage at the reality of HER, you will do anything and everything to try and punch her in the gut, including digging up old as s photos and ascribing motivations to her that exist only in your heated toxic embittered and jealous brain.

As for your theory (repressed memories), does it skip every 3 years? Angelina was resplendent in white satin just in 2004, she was solo and looked like a goddess - I'm sure you must remember, she had the exact same serene demeanor when posing for pics, and then while walking, she smiled, talked and laughed. Same as she did on Monday night, except that this time she had the love her life, Brad Pitt with her.

Or is it that you only tend to recall whatever you think might ridicule Jolie best?? News bulletin, I don't think Angelina gives a f*ck about some jealous irate faux news hen, posting a pic of her with her brother on Oscar night, or recalling the tired old retreads of 'blood vials,' or (gasp!) 'black leather pants!' LMAO, what are you....80?

Hey Elizabeth where's all the hate coming from? Why would one woman call another woman the "C" word? I watched the Golden Globes, I watched all the red carpet interviews, including the one with Ryan Seacrest, and read everything I could get my hands on about what went on during the ceremony. All I've seen are pictures of Angelina smiling and waving to fans. I've read about how "lovely" in demeanor Brad and Angelina were, how contented they looked, and how Angelina spent time talking to her table mates every chance she got. I still for the life of me can't understand why you or Ryan would say she was in a bad mood and trust me I've looked for a reason. I've watched the Ryan Seacrest interview countless times and call me crazy but I think she was being nice and wanted to keep the focus on Brad.

Why don't you spend column space talking about how I. Washington likes to throw out homophobic terms or how Penelope Cruz shot Ryan Seacrest one of the dirtiest looks ever for asking her about Orlando Bloom or how Brad Grey spent the evening playing musical chairs trying to get the best photo op?

One last thing, you talk about how one of your sources overheard Angelina say she and Brad left one of their kids crying. Well, was your source standing next to the Entertainment Tonight reporter, because Angelina talks about leaving a crying child at home during her interview with them. I wouldn't really call your source a source. Anyway, I don't know, it just seems like your taking cheap shots and looking for an easy target and doing that makes you no better than the National Enquirer.

Elizabeth is just doing her job. Leave her alone.

Okay, settle down guys. Fact is, it's not my adjective. Several reliable and reputable journalists working the red carpet reported and personally told me she was acting like the you-know-what word. Other people - friends and coworkers - who were watching the arrivals from their TVs at home also asked what on earth had crawled up her skirt and bitten her on the behind. The reports were unanimous: the A B and C words. I was actually in the International Ballroom in the HIlton during the arrivals and only saw her during the show in the smoking area, where she definitely did not look her usual smiling and cheerful self. Even a peck on the cheek from Brad didn't help. I first interviewed her eons ago, a few weeks before she won an award for "Gia." She was a delightful, provocative, honest and open young woman then and still is. Fact is, she was not happy about being at the Globes - family problems, memories, "Ryan Peecrest," whatever - something was off.

Thanks Elizabeth. Didn't mean to come down on you. It just irks me when I read/hear women call other women derogatory names. Hey I wasn't there so I can only go on what I saw on tv and read. Maybe you're right and she was in a foul mood but from where I sit this woman has been unfairly picked on for the last year and its getting old fast. Anyway, I think some bigger stories came out of the Globes than Angelina's mood and I just wish writers like yourself would focus on those. Thanks for replying.