From Inside the Box: TV News and Buzz
Follow Zap2it:

'The Young Turks' Cenk Uygur: Out at MSNBC but still online

Cenk-Uygur-Young-Turks.jpgAfter a six-month tryout as host of "MSNBC Live" in the 6 p.m. ET time slot, left empty when the cable newser fired Keith Olbermann in January, Cenk Uygur of the online politics and news commentary show "The Young Turks" announced on Wednesday, July 20, that he had left MSNBC.

In a video posted on YouTube that day, Uygur told his side of the story, of how, in late June, he was offered a great deal of money for "a different role" on the network -- including weekends, but not a weekday show -- and why he turned it down.

Uygur harkened back to an April meeting with MSNBC head Phil Griffin, in which Uygur says he was told, among other things, that "people in Washington" were concerned with the "tone" of his show.

A Wednesday New York Times story quoted an email from White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer stating that neither he nor his staff had expressed concerns about Uygur to MSNBC.

In the same story, Griffin said the "people" in question were MSNBC producers who were having difficulty booking guests on Uygur's show because of his demeanor and "aggressive" body language.

In the YouTube video, Uygur talks about other parts of the conversation, in which he says Griffin told him that those at MSNBC were "insiders" and part of the "establishment."

"I don't want to go an inch beyond what I know," Uygur tells Zap2it on Friday, July 22. "I know what I was told. He was not more specific than that, just 'people in Washington.' Now, the context of the speech was incredibly clear, with the whole 'insider,' 'outsider,' 'establishment' talk, right? So, you certainly got a sense of what he was talking about.

"As to who he talked to, he never said, I don't know. I never said it was someone in the White House, because he didn't tell me that."

As for Griffin's assertion to the Times that the "people" were producers booking guests, Uygur finds it "a little unbelievable" that such issues would go right to the head of the network.

"Second of all," he says, "if my bookers told them they were concerned about my body language, waving my arms around, etc., I wouldn't be given a long speech about insiders, outsiders, establishment -- what a strange way to communicate that message, if that were the real message. It stretches imagination a little bit."

Uygur believes it's more a question of a cable news network protecting its access to political movers and shakers.

"The whole point of access," he says, "is we're supposed to arrive at the truth. It's supposed to be a means to an end. We're getting information and delivering it to our audience. But in so much of corporate media, it has become the end, not the means, because they feel it's entertainment to some degree. We've got to have two sides on, and they've got to battle.

"I don't think this is an MSNBC problem so much, it just happened to me within this organization. But I would be surprised if it wasn't happening to all the networks and all the cable news to some degree, I would say, in fact, to a large degree."

To protect the outsider, truth-to-power image he has cultivated at "The Young Turks," Uygur felt he had to go.

"Our media is not leveling with the people," he says, "because they're obsessed with access. If I didn't tell that story, given that I knew it, I had that story ... it didn't happen to somebody else. It happened to me, and if I didn't share it with my audience, I think it violates the contract that I have with my audience."

At "The Young Turks," a "big portion," as Uygur says, of the revenue comes from subscribers.

When it's suggested that, instead of pandering to advertisers and politicians, he might instead pander to his subscribers, Uygur says, "No, because I have a long-term view of it. For example, when I began to realize that Obama was not at all progressive, when I basically realized that he wasn't the guy we thought we voted for, I started saying it.

"That, of course, angered a sizable percentage of our audience, right? A lot of them left and said, 'I can't believe you're saying this about a Democratic president,' and they left membership.

"Our brand is truth-telling, right? And it's more important that I stick to that brand in the long term. I'll get a larger audience that way than if you just go with the wind of what people happen to think that day, according to your interpretation."

While he's staying with "The Young Turks," Uygur hasn't ruled out doing more television.

"If someone else on TV," he says, "is willing to accept how I do the show -- and now everyone is aware of what I feel is the right way to do a show -- and they want me to do that as well as doing 'The Young Turks,' sure, of course, I would be willing to talk about that.

"We might have some exciting news about 'The Young Turks' in a couple of weeks, but that's not ready yet.'"

keith-olbermann-msnbc.jpgOne of the first interviews Uygur gave after his departure was on the Thursday episode of "Countdown With Keith Olbermann," the new, Current TV version of Olbermann's former MSNBC show.

In a brief segment at the end of the show, Uygur took questions and reiterated much of he said in the YouTube video.

Asked if he thought that going so quickly to Olbermann's show permanently squelched any chance of him returning to MSNBC, Uygur says, "I think I had already eliminated that possibility earlier."

As for word that radio host Al Sharpton is soon to be hired for a show in the 6 p.m. ET slot. Uygur says, "One of my best friends had a funny line about this whole thing, like, 'I can't believe we live in a world where they brought in Al Sharpton, because Cenk was too controversial.'"
Follow Zap2it on Twitter and Zap2it on Facebook for the latest news and buzz
Photo/Video credit: TheYoungTurks.com, MSNBC
 
 
 
 
Zap2it Elite Sheet Must Reads from the Web's In-Crowd
 

if it were the bookers they'd be concerned with not finding guests, not his tone, the people concerned with his tone would be the politicians.

I miss Cenk's show! I had not heard about his being asked to leave. He told it like it is and as far as Obama goes, I voted for this man too and like Cenk, am terribly disappointed in his performance as President. Instead of playing nice guy to those on the Right who were his guests, Cenk held their feet to the fire - something all of us out here would love to do.
As someone who was an independent for years, I picked the Democratic party in 2008, but realize I am more of a Progressive.
MSNBC made a huge mstake by taking both Obermann and Cenk from their lineup. The only ones left who I will listen are Maddow and Chris Mathews.
Al Sharpton is a compelte zero!!!!!!! And boring!

Al Sharpton just doesn't cut it. Cenk was much better. It was good to hear from someone that had a bit of a different view.

I am devastated they fired Cenk, but notsurprised. He quickly became my favorite, next to Maddow. I like Matthews, but hate the arguing and talking over each other. Cenk was the ONLY ONE willing to take on Obama, who daily reneges on his campeign ptomises. He even threw away 25,000 or million young supporters after taking the primary by changing position on ending Afghan war, Iraq war, single-payer plan, etc. As a result, I (a lifelong Democrat), dif not vote for him. I voted for Ralph Nader after hearing him speak from the steps of the Stock Exchange. How can anyone believe in him when it took him a year to draft a health care plan, but not the one supported by majority of Americans & 75% of health care providers? Because he has no allegiance to us! He is beholden to Big Pharma, which funded his campaign, the investment banks, & Big Oil (BP made frequent visits to White House prior to Gulf Oil spill -- whose victims have STILL not been compensated. He extended the Bush tax cuts a few months ago. How much evidence do we need to get that he's dishonest, breaks his promises & does more for Corporate America than our people, many of whom are losing faith in him - finally! Thank God for Cenk's courage to speak the truth about Obama, whose omly allegiance seems to be to himself. As a senior, his actions this week equate with genocide in my opiniom. He cut energy assistance lasdtyear - how many poor & seniors died? Let's bring back Hillary whose war chest of $3Mill is still sitting there. She has 3 times his legislative experience (6 yrs), met w/Obama twice post-primary to plead w/him to go w/single-payer plan, & had the respect of Republicans who worked with her. Our country is in crisis. We cannot survive more economic losses.

I could not have agreed more with Linda Moore's posting! I enjoyed Cenk Uygur, looking forward to watching his commentary every evening. Al Sharpton is good, but it is not the same! Truly, I now hardly watch MSNBC because of Cenk not being on!!
WE DID LOSE OUT NOT HAVING HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT! Our country would never be in this pathetic pithole!
Men just do not allow a woman to have a seat in the Presidency. It should be, the absolute best qualified for our Nation, whether it be man or woman!!

The Young ****!!!!!!!!! LMAO

Enjoyed Cenk's perspectives.

MSNBC had let go 2 of the greatest Journalists in present U.S. history. Keith Olberman and Cenk Uygur are irreplaceable.

I wouldn’t hesitate for one second to change MSNBC for another Network who will have the privilege to have these two “giants” (Keith Olberman and Cenk Uygur) aboard.

With all my respect to: Lawrence O’Donnell, Ed Schultz, Chris Mathews and Rachel Madow, who I greatly admire and think they are also doing a great job.

But, I don’t understand however, why none of them protested loud and clear to prevent MSNBC Management from comitting such stupidity.(Where was their Solidarity?)

What a disappointment really! I wanted to believe that MSNBC was an exception from all other Networks that are constantly embracing Journalists members to practice corruption. Surprisingly, MSNBC is not an exemption.

There is absolutely NO reason or any justification at all, to have “fired” such valuables Journalists. Hard to believe such stupidity.

I take it that this specific site is for young people, n'est pas? In any event, I could not agree more with the comments above. I have been a longtime Democrat since I'm 63 years old and I would definitely say that I am progressive and liberal. It was a grave mistake on the part of MSNBC to about rid of both Cenk Uygur and Keith Olbermann. I too find it difficult to listen to Chris and to the good Rev. I found and still find Al Sharpton to be a big zero and basically a know nothing who cannot articulate what he actually is trying to say. MSNBC simply does not know what it's doing!

My wife and I listened to Cenk every time he was on and wondered where he went to as he was the best personality on TV. We were saddened to think he would not be on and hope someone realizes he is the best and they get him back soon.

Zap2it Newsletter
Find it fast
Click Here
Our Partners