Hey NBC: It's time for an even bigger change
OK, NBC. You've already upended the traditional network model by putting a talk show in primetime five days a week next season. But if you're going to blow your schedule up , then in the interest of quality programming and serving your viewers and advertisers, then starting with Monday's "infront" presentation, you really need to commit. In other words, it's time to blow it up real good.
By running Jay Leno at 10 p.m. ET every weeknight starting in the fall, you're cutting your traditional schedule by five hours -- and probably losing some short-term ratings battles in the process (although given the performance of some of your 10 p.m. series this season, you're probably used to that). I get the business reasons behind the Leno move -- his show will be a lot cheaper than producing five dramas for those hours, and it will be in originals far more often than scripted shows.
But it's also turned off a lot of fans, who see the move as just another loss for quality scripted (and unscripted, for that matter) series on network TV, and another reason not to watch NBC next season. You can fix that, if rather than just trotting out a regular network schedule with the last hour chopped off, you change up the way you do business by scheduling more shows but with shorter seasons, scheduling as few repeats as you can and actually committing to the series you do put on the air.
This season may actually be the perfect opportunity for you to try something like this, because the Winter Olympics will cut the 2009-10 season pretty neatly in two. The Winter Games will fill your schedule from Feb. 12-28, allowing you essentially to offer up two different seasons.
The talk about shortening "Heroes" to 18 episodes or so next season? That would make it a perfect fit for the fall part of your season. It could run for 12 or 13 weeks from late September to early December, take the holidays (a time when no one watches much TV anyway) off, then return in early January for five or six episodes before the Olympics begin.
Want to bring critical darling "Chuck" back but still concerned about its not-great ratings (7.2 million viewers, 2.5 rating in adults 18-49)? Then lower your risk a little and pick up 13 or 15 episodes. In fact, do that with most of your series. Shorter seasons will allow for more focused storytelling and not force you to stretch a 22-episode order out over 36 weeks. It will mean fewer reruns and more new content on the air -- thereby easing the loss of 10 p.m. weeknights in the fall.
If you do that, though, there's one thing I can't stress enough: Have a little freakin' patience. Now, if something tanks as badly as, say, "The Chopping Block" did, no one could really expect you to keep it on the air. But you're already in fourth place -- is it really gonna kill you to leave a well-reviewed but maybe only marginally rated show on the air for its full 13 episodes and see if it can get a real fan base going?
You want a little continuity on the schedule? Fine. You've already renewed "The Office," "30 Rock," "Law & Order: SVU" and "The Biggest Loser" for next season. Give those veteran shows their usual 22 to 25 episodes and let them anchor a couple nights (the comedies on Thursday, "SVU" at 9 on Tuesdays and an hour-long "Biggest Loser" wherever you might need it).
You could even use that small amount of time between New Year's and the opening ceremony in Vancouver to experiment a little -- maybe give a new show a six-episode tryout, and if it does well, order up a few more for spring 2010.
Word is, NBC, that you won't be announcing a complete schedule at the presentation Monday, just what you're bringing back and which pilots you've picked up to series. That makes some sense, I guess -- better to see what the other guys do and then make your schedule rather than announce a slate and then have to change it around a bunch in reaction to other networks' moves, as was the case a few years ago.
I'll be curious to see what you come up with on Monday, NBC. I hope it includes more "Chuck," and I really hope it's more than just a Leno-fied version of a traditional network schedule. Your downward spiral has to end sometime (doesn't it?). Might as well start next week.
Related:
Upfront buzz: 'Community' building, hope for 'Chuck' at NBC
16 shows we'd like to see next season
Pilot season roundup



How on earth does it make sense for NBC to run a one-hour Biggest Loser? If your top-rated show can take TWO hours, even on a limited schedule, why wouldn't you let it?
I totally agree with this post and I've been thinking this for some time. I think the cable model of running smaller seasons with no repeats is something people really like as evidenced by the rise in cable ratings. Plus it allows the writers to focus creatively rather then drag out a long season with filler episodes.
My curiosity is piqued b/c I want to see just where NBC's 10 pm scripted shows like Medium currently on Mondays I believe and L&O: SVU on Tuesdays, etc. are going to be placed on the schedule with Jay Leno occupying the 10 pm time slot come fall.
I've been a fan of Jay Leno's for years, a Tonight Show fan. However, I am more a fan of scripted TV and I dislike what NBC is doing. Therefore, in protest, I won't watch Leno or anything else on the network. There's enough on ABC, CBS, and the cable stations to keep my Tivo very busy.
There is no way that Leno will win the hour up against a show like CSI, so basically the network is not even striving to be #1. I am surprised the affiliates are taking this. Productions costs are one thing, but the local guys have to sell advertising time and they will not be able to sell at a premium. Feel sorry for Jimmy at the end of a three hour talk spree every night.
Yeah, poor Jimmy Kimmell.
I have to completely disagree with your idea about "Heroes." Those interminable mid-season breaks are what's killing the show! If the season is to be shortened, then just bring it back in the spring for one continuous run without pre-emptions, interruptions or weeks-on-end breaks! It works for "24" and bringing back "Lost" for a 16 episode run hasn't hurt it - even with the lone repeat and clip job episode!
There is nothing on NBC anymore since Kings is gone. NBC hasnt been up to par in quite some time. Their shows are mostly the same cop dramas out the wazoo. Do something different change it up. One thing i hate with all the networks is not giving enough time for shows to develop an audience. 3 episodes at most and they are gone. Maybe shorter seasons are the way to go. I really hate how the networks have one new episode then show reruns for a month like wtf is that crap. Show the whole season until its done no reruns.
as long as they don't cancel southland or medium, i couldnt care less about the network. NBC has sucked for some time now :\
I disagree with this NBC sucks mentality. Between Chuck, Life, Friday Night Lights, and its Thursday night comedies, NBC has tried interesting and different kinds of shows. They are the only network to test different types of shows such as Kings even if they fail. CBS does its multitude of crime dramas and ABC has ... Dancing? I don't know because ABC doesn't have anything I care to watch.
So, give NBC a break. I think the Leno move is a mistake for the long-term good of the network and for network TV, but the problem isn't that NBC isn't producing good TV. It's that people prefer dancing, singing, and people losing weight or picking suitcases.