'Lost': Previewing 'The Little Prince'
I'm sure you've been counting down the days since 'Jughead' to get your greedy eyes on the next episode of Lost, entitled 'The Little Prince.' And trust me, I'm right there with you. While I managed to catch the first three episodes early, ABC's decided to pull the plug on screeners for the time being. And despite what you may have heard, it's got nothing to do with a certain trenchcoat wearing, Boston-based balding blogger holding up a boom box outside Damon Lindelof's house, blasting "Make Your Own Kind of Music" at all hours of the night. At least, I think it's got nothing to do with that.
So the lack of screeners means that there will be no live chat this week. Sorry about that. We'll have chats periodically throughout the season, and throughout Zap2It as well. (Check out this swanky Super Bowl-based chat!) It's just too hard to watch the episode and moderate the literally thousands of comments that come from your nimble fingertips. Consider the comments section below your forum for discussion during and immediately after the episode.
Now, that title...seems to me that Darlton want us to re-read a certain classic story in preparation for this episode. And confession time: I've never read it until this week. I probably should have read it upon learning the episode's title a few months ago, but then I saw something shiny and got distracted. So I won't pretend to be an expert in any way shape or form about this novel and its relationship to Lost, but a few things really, really jumped out at me upon reading.
There's a magic box! The Little Prince's first interaction with the narrator consists of the Prince asking him to draw a sheep. After being unable to satisfy the Prince's needs a few times through, he then draws a box, inside of which the sheep resides. This pleases the Prince immensely, and pleases me even more.
There are familiar archetypes! The Little Prince and the narrator meet several people with which Lost fans might recognize counterparts in their universe. The Drunkard/Tippler (Christian?), The Businessman (Widmore?), and most intriguingly, The Lamplighter. Of the last, The Little Prince says, "That man is the only one of them all whom I could have made my friend. But his planet is indeed too small. There is no room on it for two people..." So, there's only one person who can light the lamp...or, perhaps, lantern? Sounds awfully familiar.
Time is relative! The Little Prince's home planet is so small, he experiences sunsets and sunrises just by moving his chair. He's horribly confused by his inability to do so on earth. In addition, the Lamplighter bemoans the increasingly rapid pace at which his world turns.
Nature talks back! Just as several characters commune with the Island, the Prince communes with a single rose. In both cases, the relationship can strain the patience and adversely affect the emotions of the humans involved.
There's an extinct volcano! While two of the three volcanos on his planet are active (and help cook his meals), the third lays dormant. However, the Prince cryptically says, "One never knows!" Hmmmm....
There's an Army of the Light and Army of the Dark! To be fair, these are plants more than people, but nevertheless coexist as invisible seeds, which must be constantly tended to before an imbalance exists. Should the dark seeds take hold, the Prince's world could literally be split apart. So as the Prince farms, he saves the world. (And yes, the Prince-as-farmer should harken you back to the farmer/hunter debate surrounding Locke.)
Death is not what it seems! In the final chapter, The Little Prince bids the narrator goodbye. He tells the narrator that while it may look as if he died, it's simply that his body is to heavy to take back with him to his planet. Read into that what you will, but it makes my Lost brain go 'splodey.
Feel free to leave other examples you notice in The Little Prince in the comments below. I am positive there are plenty I have missed, but hopefully these few examples get your mind working as we approach the fourth episode of the season.
Ryan also posts every 108 minutes over at Boob Tube Dude, then peruses Zap2It's Guide to Lost Facebook group. He also encourages you to subscribe to the Zap2It's Guide to Lost Twitter feed.


My favorite line from the book which explains how I feel about lost : "It was from words dropped by chance that, little by little, everything was revealed to me."
My favorite line is never translated well: On risque de pleurer un peu si l'on s'est laisse apprivoiser. Roughly, you risk crying a little if you let yourself be tamed. It's from the section with the fox, where at first he recognizes the fox as an enemy, but every day, the little prince and the fox move closer until they have mutual trust and respect. Several relationships come to mind with this one- Jack and the O6 learning to trust Ben is a big one.
Also, I think one of the most recognizable quotes from The Little Prince is "And now here is my secret, a very simple secret; it is only with the heart that one can see rightly, what is essential is invisible to the eye." It kind of hurts my brain to analyze it, but I'm sure it must be relevant.
Finally, the last line of the book, after the prince has disappeared, the narrator gives this plea: "Wait for a time, exactly under the star. Then, if a little man appears who laughs, who has golden hair and who refuses to answer questions, you will know who he is. If this should happen, please comfort me. Send me word that he has come back." A little man appears from thin air? Who doesn't answer questions? Ben? Should I send word you've returned?
Oh man...I can't get past the first paragraph. I'm stuck with the mental image of a "certain trenchcoat wearing, Boston-based balding blogger"....
I see the word "trenchcoat" and I instantly picture a flasher in the park from the 1970s.
Soooo disturbing. I must shut down immediately and tomorrow I'll figure out how to read the rest of what I'm sure is a highly entertaining and fun blog.
I think it must also be important that one of the overarching themes of the story is his inability to understand the world of grown-ups. That the simple answers are the best. That a child's world is filled with awe. "Grown-ups never understand anything by themselves, and it is exhausting for children to have to provide explanations over and over again." Maybe we will be looking more to Aaron and Walt, or young Ben or John, for answers.
Taking a survey.
Besides the stories correlations, will this eps also refer to "The little Prince" as
A. Aaron
B. baby Charlie
C. Little Locke
D. Trenchcoat Bostonian
E. none of above
Pssst.... Deb....
I've added a photo over at the Facebook group. I can't guarantee that it will alleviate your disturbance. In fact, it might make it worse. Good luck. ;)
Man, who thought a children's book could be so deep...
(Alice in Wonderland, Wizard of Oz)
...damnit.
This story is somewhat su****ious in nature. Is it really a cl***ic? I read the entire text online:
http://home.pacific.net.hk/~rebylee/text/prince/contents.html
But now I'm starting to wonder, with the way that it's written, if there are two possibilities:
A. The entire plot of L O S T is based on this book. (I would be disappointed to know this much too early.)
B. The book is a plant designed to "get our minds right" for what's to come.
I'm very disappointed that I don't have time to read this book and that I've never read it before. This comparison to Lost stuff is kind of spoilerish to me when you consider that I have no idea what this book is about.
That said, my nose is bleeding and my head is buzzing from what I've read here so far today. I hope my brains don't go all splodey on me tonight.
Hopefully, tomorrow I can share with some intelligence. From the previews we've seen on TV, it looks as if Kate has some real trouble with her little prince, Aaron. I can't wait!!
I also had never read this cl***ic, but checked out a synopsis on line. I think another interesting archetype the Prince encounters in the book is the King, who only orders his subjects to do what they were already going to do anyway and thus is always obeyed. Could this be like Locke, telling people to do things in the past that already happened?